Burdens of Wealth, Part 2: Watch out

Posted by Rob Walker on June 29, 2007
Posted Under: America,Lux,Suggestions

Following up on yesterday’s post about Robert Frank’s book Richistan: I mentioned my favorite example of how wealthy consumers feel compelled to move on from anything that gets too widely adapted was in the category of watches. I have been interested in the watch market for some time, without ever really coming up with a good way to write about it.
Frank cites data from an organization called The Luxury Institute; in 2006, it conducted a poll of people with a net worth of $5 million or more, to learn what the most prestigious wristwatch might be. Cartier came in 13th. Rolex made the top 10, but “barely,” Frank writes. First place went to Franck Mueller, “a newcomer from Switzerland that sells fewer than 4,500 watches a year in the United States.” The brand’s cheapest offering costs $4,800. The most expensive: $600,000-plus. “Frank Mueller,” Frank writes, “has become the timepiece of choice for the New Rich.”

The interesting thing about watches as a carrier of prestige is that watches have, in recent years, become so superfluous for most of us. If you have a cell phone, you have the time on you; you don’t need a watch. And indeed, I have read that mainstream watch sales are hurting.

Luxury watch sales, however, are not hurting at all. (Recently even Timex has been repositioning to try to cut more lux-oriented deals.) One suspects that this is precisely because high end watches have very little to do with knowing what time it is. Indeed, Frank points out that Frank Muller’s “most popular watches the Crazy Hours, a $20,000 timepiece that features mixed-up numbers on the face.” Even a company spokesperson admits that actually using it to tell time can be “tricky.” Frank cites Business Week reviewer suggesting that maybe the best strategy is to wear this watch in addition to a second one that you can actually read.
Funny. But I’d suggest a different direction: Why not make a watch that is purely aesthetics-based, and does not tell time at all? Think of the design possibilities a watch could offer if you didn’t have to worry about the whole time-telling trope, with the annoying minute, hour, and second hands, which all seems pretty played-out anyway. People who pay twenty grand for a watch not only have a cell phone and five other gizmos at hand to tell them what time it is, they also have a variety of flunkies to drive them around and make their appointments for them. Leave watches that track of hours and minutes to the proles.

Further diversion may be found at MKTG Tumblr, and the Consumed Facebook page.

Reader Comments

In other words, a bracelet.

I think the problem is that for most men in business attire, jewelry at least has to appear functional or information-bearing (watch, wedding ring, perhaps class ring, organization-related lapel pin, etc.).

#1 
Written By Susan Scafidi on July 2nd, 2007 @ 1:04 pm

No! Not a bracelet! You’re missing the point!

The point is, it would be a watch that doesn’t tell time, nor even attempt to. Thus it WOULD appear functional (for men or for women), solving the problem you refer to. It would appear, in fact, to be a watch.

I want to keep the watch form. I don’t want to see the bracelet form. I very specifically want to see the watch form, without the time-telling, so as to open up greater possibilities for doing something more interesting with canvass-like face area. (Something a bracelet, for instance, lacks.)

You see?

Part of it of course is that I’m kidding.

And part of it is that I”m not .

#2 
Written By murketing on July 2nd, 2007 @ 4:09 pm

I’ve seen a few on some coolhunter sites, here’s a couple from a lazy search of Boingboing:
http://www.boingboing.net/2006/07/30/beautiful_nooka_watc.html
http://www.boingboing.net/2003/08/21/japanese_watches_fro.html

#3 
Written By dave on July 5th, 2007 @ 10:25 am
Next Post: